No, asteroid 2006 QV89 wonât strike Earth in September
Over this past month, there’ve been numerous articles (for example, here and here) about a space rock that’ll pass closest to Earth on September 9, 2019. Some focus on the minuscule chance this asteroid might strike Earth in September, but we’re here to focus on the much, much, much greater chance this asteroid will not strike us. In fact, asteroid 2006 QV89 is currently classified by astronomers as NO HAZARD. It is not expected to hit Earth. Although asteroid 2006 QV89 does appear on a “risk objects list” from the European Space Agency, it is important to note that the asteroid has a Torino Scale of 0, which indicates its no hazard status. You can note that for yourself on the chart below, from ESA. Like many asteroids, 2006 QV89 is on a “risk” list, but ESA currently classifies it as a non-priority risk.
As of June 2019, calculations made by NASA/JPL with the available data suggest the space rock will not even have a particularly close approach to Earth in September 2019.
According to NASA’s Center for Near Earth Object Studies, 2006 QV89 will likely pass so far from our planet that there is a 99.989 percent chance the space rock will miss the Earth in September 2019.
Many asteroids temporarily appear in a risk list due to uncertainties in their orbits. These sorts of uncertainties typically occur when an object has been recently discovered by observatories, and seen only during a few nights after the discovery, afterwards becaming too faint to observe. As an asteroid is re-observed – and astronomers’ asteroid-orbit modeling programs recognize it as an asteroid previously detected – the incoming new observations let astronomers better refine its orbit. The Catalina Sky Survey in Arizona discovered 2006 QV89 on August 29, 2006. At that time, it had a very short (10-day) observation arc. The Arecibo Observatory made radar observations of this asteroid on September 6, 2006. Then, as it sped on, it was lost from view again and has not been detected since 2006.
Yet – from their brief observations of it, and from their knowledge of asteroids in general, which has grown dramatically in recent decades – astronomers can estimate that 2006 QV89 is about 98-131 feet (30-40 meters) in diameter, or about the length of an American football field. It’s classified as an Apollo type asteroid, which are Earth-crossing asteroids, of which some 20,000 are known as of January 2019.
Writing at Science20, Robert Walker had a good explanation for the status on asteroid 2006 QV89. He wrote on June 7, 2019:
Short summary for the panicking: Expected to miss and currently classified NO HAZARD. Tiny, most likely for an asteroid of that size is ‘Splosh in Pacific’. Likely many thousands of years before any such asteroid hits an urban area.
It is just a random asteroid, there are many in the table every year with dates that they ‘could’ hit, but they are classified as no hazard because they are all expected to miss. The press just picks up one of those many asteroids at random from time to time. Every year many asteroids are removed from the table that had dates of possible impacts that year. It is just one of numerous NO HAZARD asteroids currently in the table.
Some time in the next century or two then we can expect one of those many asteroids to hit, but if they are being tracked we would have at least 10 years warning to evacuate any city. The most likely thing is that the next asteroid to hit just sploshes harmlessly in the ocean. Hitting a city is extremely unlikely and most likely have to wait many thousands of years for that. An impact close enough to a city to warn residents to watch out for flying glass like Chelyabinsk is more likely and could happen, but not nearly as likely as a harmless splosh in the ocean.
This is an example of a ‘sensationalist press chose a random asteroid’ story. NASA didn’t warn us about it, and nor did ESA. It is expected to miss and is currrently classified as no hazard.
In short … don’t worry about ateroid 2006 QV89. It’s not going to hit us.
So how about seeing it as it passes? According to ESA, asteroid 2006 QV89 will show a maximum brightness or magnitude of +21.9 in September 2019, which means the space rock will appear extremely faint. It’ll be so faint that it will not even be visible with most telescopes, except for a few huge, observatory-type instruments.
Astronomers and other scientists are practicing with every close pass of an asteroid, in order to better prepare for a real scenario of any dangerous close approach on the future. What’s more, NASA is going to practice deflecting an asteroid from its path. The Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART mission) is a planned space probe that will demonstrate the effects of crashing an impactor spacecraft into an asteroid moon for planetary defense purposes. It will launch in June 2021 and will try to impact a 525-foot (160-meter) moonlet in the binary asteroid Didymos. The intentional impact should occur sometime in September 2022. Read more about DART.
Eventually, it’s likely we will learn to deflect an incoming asteroid. Right now, though, if scientists were to detect an incoming asteroid, the best defense we have is to determine the impact area as precisely as possible, and then to evacuate the area. An excellent exercise occurred on November 13, 2015. A small object – which then was determined to be space debris – was detected with a trajectory that would intercept Earth. A team of scientists was able to determine it would enter Earth’s atmosphere over the ocean near Sri Lanka, and a “no fly”and “no fishing” zone was issued.
So there you have it. As we’ve said many times before, and as is still true, as of now, there’s no known dangerous asteroid that poses any imminent risk of Earth impact. Could an asteroid strike Earth? Of course. That’s why astronomers continue to be watchful.
Bottom line: Asteroid 2006 QV89 has been unfairly hyped as posing a threat to Earth in September 2019. In fact, it’s one of many asteroids on astronomers’ risk list, but it’s not classified as a priority risk. It’s classified as “no hazard.”