Please help keep this Site Going

Menopausal Mother Nature

News about Climate Change and our Planet


New Wind and Solar Power Is Cheaper than Existing Coal in Much of the U.S., Analysis Finds

Coal-fired power plants in the Southeast and along the Ohio River stand out for the higher cost of coal-fired power compared to building new wind or solar nearby.

Nearly three-fourths of the country’s coal-fired power plants already cost more to operate than if wind and solar capacity were built in the same areas to replace them, a new analysis says. (Credit: Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Images) Click to Enlarge.

Not a single coal-fired power plant along the Ohio River will be able to compete on price with new wind and solar power by 2025, according to a new report by energy analysts.

The same is true for every coal plant in a swath of the South that includes the Carolinas, Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi.  They’re part of the 86 percent of coal plants nationwide that are projected to be on the losing end of this cost comparison, the analysis found.

The findings are part of a report issued Monday by Energy Innovation and Vibrant Clean Energy that shows where the shifting economics of electricity generation may force utilities and regulators to ask difficult questions about what to do with assets that are losing their value.

The report takes a point that has been well-established by other studies—that coal power, in addition to contributing to air pollution and climate change, is often a money-loser—and shows how it applies at the state level and plant level when compared with local wind and solar power capacity.

Read more at New Wind and Solar Power Is Cheaper than Existing Coal in Much of the U.S., Analysis Finds

Please help keep this Site Going